在相同或类似商品上，被申请人通过前加词语“梵”、后加词语“帝”（“梵帝

On the same or similar commodities, the respondent added the word "Fan" before it and the word "Di" after it ("Brahma" has the same pronunciation as the respondent's store abbreviation "Fandi", and the shape and appearance are very similar) , which completely included the applicant’s previous highly distinctive and well-known word mark “Pandora”, which could easily make the relevant public mistakenly believe that the disputed trademark and the applicant’s trademark belonged to a series of trademarks and confuse the source of the goods.

On the same or similar goods, the respondent has fully included the applicant's previously highly prominent and well-known written trademark "Pandora" by adding the word "van" before it and the word "di" after it (the pronunciation of "van di" is the same as the respondent's store abbreviation "van di", and the shape and appearance are extremely similar), It is easy for the relevant public to mistakenly believe that the disputed trademark and the applicant's trademark belong to a series of trademarks, leading to confusion about the origin of the goods.

For the same or similar goods, the Respondent completely included the word mark Pandora, which was highly prominent and well-known by the Applicant, by adding the word "Fandi" before it and the word "Di" after it ("Fandi" has the same pronunciation as the respondent's shop abbreviation "Fandi", and its shape and appearance are extremely similar), which easily led the relevant public to mistake the disputed trademark and the Applicant's trademark for a series of trademarks and confuse the source of the goods.