但随着通信技术的发展与人们生活方式的信息化，对信息收集价值的判断不再以

However, with the development of communication technology and the informatization of people's lifestyles, the judgment of the value of information collection is no longer the only criterion for privacy. Non-private information is increasingly being used commercially to affect the personality interests of data subjects, and this impact cannot be summarized by any specific personality right, so “privacy” is the upper concept of “right to be forgotten” There is a certain irrationality.

However, with the development of communication technology and people's way of life information, the value of information collection is no longer judged on whether private as the only criterion. Non-privacy information is increasingly being used by business to affect the personality interests of data subjects, and this influence can not be summed up by any kind of specific personality right, so there is a certain irrationality in taking "privacy right" as the upper concept of "right to be forgotten".

However, with the development of communication technology and the informatization of people's lifestyle, the value of information collection is no longer judged by privacy. Non privacy information is more and more used by business, which affects the personality interests of data subjects, and this influence can not be summarized by any specific personality right. Therefore, it is unreasonable to take "privacy" as the upper concept of "forgotten right".<br>