两组患者治疗前后髋关节功能评分对比分析两组患者治疗前后髋关节功能评分（

两组患者治疗前后髋关节功能评分对比分析两组患者治疗前后髋关节功能评分（Harris 评分）对比见表3。实验组与对照组治疗前Harris 评分无显著性差异。治疗2周后两组患者Harris 评分较治疗前明显改善（p=0.00），实验组较对照组改善明显，评分明显高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（p=0.03）表3两组患者手术前后髋关节功能评分比较分析

0/5000

源语言: -

目标语言: -

结果 (英语) 1: [复制]

复制成功！

Comparison analysis of hip joint function scores before and after treatment between the two groups of patients (Harris score) is shown in Table 3. There was no significant difference in Harris scores between the experimental group and the control group before treatment. After 2 weeks of treatment, the Harris scores of the two groups of patients were significantly improved compared to before treatment (p=0.00), the experimental group was significantly better than the control group, and the scores were significantly higher than the control group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.03) Table 3 Two groups of patients Comparative analysis of hip function scores before and after operation

正在翻译中..

结果 (英语) 2:[复制]

复制成功！

A comparative analysis of hip function scores before and after treatment in two groups of patients The hip function score (Harris score) was compared to Table 3 between the two groups of patients before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in Harris scores between the experimental group and the control group before treatment. Harris scores were significantly improved in two groups of patients after 2 weeks of treatment (p-0.00), while the experimental group improved significantly compared to the control group, with scores significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p-0.03) Table 3 A comparative analysis of hip function scores before and after surgery was performed on two groups of patients

正在翻译中..

结果 (英语) 3:[复制]

复制成功！

Comparison and analysis of hip joint function score between the two groups before and after treatment The comparison of hip joint function score (Harris score) between the two groups before and after treatment is shown in Table 3. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the experimental group and the control group before treatment. After 2 weeks of treatment, Harris score of the two groups was significantly improved compared with that before treatment (P = 0.00), and that of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P = 0.03) Table 3 Comparison and analysis of hip joint function score between the two groups before and after operation

正在翻译中..

其它语言

本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.