孩子的妈妈与老奶奶的话彼此没有什么联系，谈不上贴切,因此,违反了关联准

The mother of the child and the grandmother had nothing to do with each other, and it was not appropriate to talk about it. Therefore, the association rule was violated. The grandmother said that her internal organs might have been injured. In fact, she was not injured, violating the substandard rule of "true" in the quality standard. The grandmother just wanted to use this kind of gag to change the subject, so that the whole family would not pursue the mistakes that led her to a dirt road and bring a cat to the car and caused a car accident, so as to win everyone's sympathy. This also reflects the grandma's selfishness and unwillingness to recognize her own wrong personality.

The child's mother and the granny's words have little to do with each other, not appropriate, and therefore, in violation of the association guidelines. The granny said her internal organs were not injured anywhere, and that she had not actually been injured, in violation of the "real" sub-guidelines in the quality code. Granny just want to pass such a interjection hiccup, transfer the topic, so that the whole family do not pursue her to lead a dirt road and take the cat on the car led to the car accident error, to win everyone's sympathy. This also reflects the old lady's selfishness and unwillingness to recognize their own wrong character.

The children's mother and grandmother's words have no connection with each other, which is not appropriate. Therefore, they violate the association rules. Grandma said that her internal organs were injured. In fact, she was not injured and violated the "true" sub criterion in the quality standard. Granny just wanted to change the topic through such a gag, so that the whole family would not pursue the mistake that she led a dirt road and took a cat to get on the car, which led to the accident, and won everyone's sympathy. It also reflects the selfishness and unwillingness of grandma to know her own wrong character.<br>