由表3-3看出，化学品企业在选择第三方物流供应商，最重要的影响因素是物

It can be seen from Table 3-3 that when chemical companies choose third-party logistics providers, the most important influencing factor is logistics costs. <br><br>The proportion of logistics cost in the choice of enterprises is 0.4734, which shows that logistics cost is the first factor that enterprises consider when choosing costs. Therefore, logistics companies with low prices have more advantages. <br><br>The second most important thing following logistics costs is service capabilities. <br><br>Service capabilities are also valued by companies when choosing third-party logistics providers. Logistics companies with strong service capabilities can better meet their logistics needs. <br><br>In contrast, service quality and corporate strength have relatively little influence. <br><br>The above four indicators can basically be used to evaluate supplier performance. <br><br>In terms of subdivision indicators, transportation costs, storage costs, accuracy and other indicators have the largest weights. This is also the direction that logistics providers should make efforts to improve themselves. <br><br>For third-party logistics providers, costs can be appropriately reduced, and service quality should be improved to win customers. <br><br>Plan selection based on comprehensive score

As can be seen from Table 3-3, the most important factor in the selection of third-party logistics suppliers by chemical companies is logistics costs.<br><br>The proportion of logistics cost in enterprise choice is 0.4734, which shows that logistics cost is the first factor that enterprises consider when choosing cost. As a result, low-priced logistics companies have an advantage.<br><br>The second most important thing to keep up with logistics costs is service capability.<br><br>Service capabilities are also highly valued by enterprises when selecting third-party logistics providers. Logistics enterprises with strong service capacity can better meet the logistics needs of enterprises.<br><br>In contrast, the quality of service, enterprise strength impact is relatively small.<br><br>The above four indicators can basically be used to evaluate the performance of suppliers.<br><br>As far as the breakdown index is concerned, the weight of transportation cost, storage cost, accuracy and other indicators is the largest, which is also the logistics supplier should make efforts to improve their own direction.<br><br>For third-party logistics suppliers, the cost can be appropriately reduced, service quality should be improved to win customers.<br><br>Options are based on a comprehensive score

It can be seen from table 3-3 that the most important factor affecting the selection of third-party logistics suppliers is logistics cost.<br>The proportion of logistics cost in enterprise selection is 0.4734, which indicates that logistics cost is the first factor to be considered when enterprises choose cost. Therefore, low price logistics companies have more advantages.<br>The second important thing to keep up with logistics cost is service ability.<br>Service ability is also valued by enterprises when choosing third party logistics suppliers. Logistics enterprises with strong service ability can better meet the logistics needs of enterprises.<br>In contrast, the impact of service quality and enterprise strength is relatively small.<br>The above four indicators can basically be used to evaluate the performance of suppliers.<br>As far as the subdivision index is concerned, the weight of transportation cost, storage cost and accuracy rate is the largest, which is also the direction that logistics suppliers should make efforts to improve themselves.<br>For the third-party logistics suppliers, the cost can be appropriately reduced, and the service quality should be improved to win customers.<br>According to the comprehensive score, the scheme is selected<br>