因为我们还要看证据，一个是现在证据上来说，狼疮还是诱导缓解中比较好的是

Because we still need to look at the evidence, one is that in terms of the current evidence, it is better to induce remission in lupus. It is better to use Cyclophosphamide and Cyclophosphamide. It must be a vasculitis disease, and it must be less of a podocyte disease. The second currently available calcium phosphate and neurophosphatase inhibitors have various problems. The drug itself has various problems, such as changes in renal function, blood sugar, and rebound with withdrawal. All exist.

Because we also have to look at the evidence, one is now the evidence, lupus or induced remission is better in the knowledge and cyclophosphamide is better, it is bound to be vasculitis lesions, the real foot cell lesions are necessarily less. The second currently available calcium phosphoric acid, neurophosphatase inhibitors have a variety of problems, the drug itself has a variety of problems, such as affecting changes in kidney function, affecting blood sugar, withdrawal rebound these problems are there.

Because we still need to look at the evidence. One is that the current evidence shows that lupus erythematosus is still better in induced remission. It is better to use mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide. It must be vasculitis and podocyte disease. Secondly, there are various problems with the calcium phosphate and nerve phosphatase inhibitors that can be used at present. There are various problems with the drug itself, such as affecting the changes of renal function, affecting blood sugar, and rebounding after withdrawal.<br>