快速康复外科理念，相比于传统围手术期措施，其在外科手术中的应用可明显增

The concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery, compared with traditional perioperative measures, its application in surgery can significantly enhance the recovery ability of patients' organs and functions [24]. <br><br>Mingli et al. believe that the average Harris hip score of preoperative and postoperative patients is 85 and 47 compared with the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery and traditional surgical postoperative care, respectively, with an excellent and good rate of 82.7% [25]. <br><br>According to our research, applying the concept of individualized rapid recovery surgery early after surgery, patients recovered significantly faster after surgery than the control group, and the weight-bearing time and fracture healing time were shorter than those of the control group, with significant differences (p=0.00). <br><br>At the same time, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group, statistically significant (p=0.03), and the differences in deep vein thrombosis and joint stiffness were more significant. <br><br>In summary, 3D printing technology-assisted surgery combined with early postoperative comprehensive rehabilitation therapy has obvious advantages over conventional treatment methods in terms of shorter operation time, less blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, weight bearing time, and hip function recovery. . The surgical reduction is accurate and the postoperative recovery is fast, which has a certain degree of safety and effectiveness. <br><br><br>The shortcomings of <br>this study The shortcomings of this study are the small number of patients and the short follow-up time, so long-term effects cannot be objectively evaluated. <br><br>In addition, for certain indicators such as fracture healing time, weight-bearing time, and hip function recovery, it has not been clearly distinguished and explained whether the above-mentioned changes are caused by 3D printing in the guidance of surgery more dominant or more dependent on early postoperative rehabilitation The implementation of surgical measures, or both play an equally important role. <br><br>Countermeasures are being taken by us to further accumulate patient data, increase the sample size, extend the follow-up time and carry out more rigorous experimental design, in order to make up for the above shortcomings and be more conducive to guiding clinical practice. <br>references:

Compared with the traditional peri-surgical measures, the application of rapid rehabilitation surgery can significantly enhance the recovery ability of patients' organs and functions.<br><br>Mingli and others believe that the average Harris hip score of preoperative and postoperative patients applied the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery and traditional postoperative care comparison of 85 and 47, respectively, with an excellent rate of 82.7%.<br><br>According to our study, applying the concept of early individualized rapid recovery surgery after surgery, patients recovered significantly faster than the control group, and the weight-carrying time and fracture healing time were shorter than that of the control group, with significant differences (p-0.00).<br><br>At the same time, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group, the statistics were significant (p-0.03), and the differences in deep vein thrombosis and joint stiffness were more significant.<br><br>To sum up, the advantages of 3D printing technology-assisted surgical combination of early comprehensive rehabilitation treatment than conventional treatment methods are obviously in the short operation time, less bleeding, postoperative hospitalization time, fracture healing time, weight-taking time and hip function recovery. The surgical reset is precise and the recovery is fast after surgery, which has certain safety and effectiveness.<br><br>The shortcomings of this study<br>The shortcomings of this study are that the number of cases in patients is small and the follow-up time is still short, and the long-term effect can not be objectively evaluated.<br><br>In addition, for some indicators such as fracture healing time, weight-carrying time and hip function recovery, it has not been clearly distinguished and explained whether the above changes are more dominant in the guiding significance of 3D printing in surgery or more dependent on the implementation of early postoperative rehabilitation surgical measures, or both play an equally important role.<br><br>Response measures are being made to further accumulate patient data, increase sample size, extend follow-up time and conduct more rigorous experimental design, with a view to remedying these deficiencies, more conducive to guiding clinical practice.<br>References:

Compared with the traditional perioperative measures, the application of fast track surgery in surgery can significantly enhance the recovery ability of various organs and functions of patients [24].<br>According to Mingli et al., the average Harris hip score of the patients before and after the operation was 85 and 47 respectively, and the excellent and good rate was 82.7% [25].<br>According to our study, the application of early individualized rapid rehabilitation surgery concept, postoperative rehabilitation of patients was significantly faster than the control group, weight-bearing time and fracture healing time were shorter than the control group, with significant difference (P = 0.00).<br>At the same time, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group (P = 0.03), especially in deep vein thrombosis and joint stiffness.<br>To sum up, 3D printing assisted surgery combined with early postoperative comprehensive rehabilitation treatment has obvious advantages over conventional treatment in terms of shorter operation time, less blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, weight-bearing time and hip joint function recovery. It has a certain safety and effectiveness.<br>The shortcomings of this study<br>The shortcomings of this study are that the number of patients is small and the follow-up time is still short, so it is impossible to evaluate the long-term effect objectively.<br>In addition, for some indicators such as fracture healing time, weight-bearing time and hip function recovery, it has not been clearly distinguished and explained whether the guiding significance of 3D printing in the operation is more dominant or depends on the implementation of early postoperative rehabilitation surgical measures, or both play an equally important role.<br>Measures are being taken to further accumulate patient data, increase the sample size, extend the follow-up time, and carry out more stringent experimental design, in order to make up for the above deficiencies, more conducive to guiding clinical practice.<br>reference: