Why should we think that art histor

Why should we think that art history has a history? I understand by a history not simply a succession of events, but those events given an order and structure. The very idea that a history can be more than a fiction arising from a Euro, phallo , logo-centric imposition of order has become highly problematic A history must be selective, which means that it leaves much out;.. and its selection principles imply value judgments which will probably be controversial One fashionable view is that any historical order must lie, ultimately, in the narrative itself, not in the events which it structures. "How," it has been asked

Why wait wait w think think t-sart history has a history? I understand by a history not simply sings a of events, butthose events singan order and structure. The very idea a history can more than a fiction ness from a Euro, phallo, logo-centric ness of order Become highly ly sa. A history must be selective, who means it leaves much out; and its selection principles srin value slys who will be probably be r. One fashionable view is that any historical order must lie, ultimately, in the narrative itself, not in the events t structures. "How," it has has been asked

为什么我们要认为艺术史有历史？我对历史的理解不仅仅是一系列事件，而是那些事件的顺序和结构。一段历史可能不仅仅是一部虚构的、源于欧元、法洛、以商标为中心的秩序强加的想法已经成为一个很大的问题。一部历史必须是有选择性的，这意味着它漏掉了很多东西；它的选择原则意味着价值判断，这可能会引起争议。一种流行的观点是，任何历史秩序最终都必须存在于叙述本身，而不是它所构成的事件之中。”怎么会有人问<br>