根据以上的情况，我认为该餐厅的服务员是 Innocent Misrep

Based on the above, I think the waiter at the restaurant is Innocent Misrepresentation. Innocent Misrepresentation means that someone has reasonable grounds to believe that the statement is true, whether when making a statement or when entering into a contract. Although this person's statement is incorrect, he honestly believes that his statement is correct. This is Innocent Misrepresentation. It can be seen from the above-mentioned events that the waiter believed that the dish was beef, but in fact it was pork. This shows that the waiter honestly believed that what he said was correct, so this belongs to Innocent Misrepresentation.

Based on the above, I think the waiter at the restaurant is Innocent Misrepresentation. Innocent Mis means that someone believes for reasonable reason that the statement is true, whether it is at the time of presentation or at the time of the establishment of the statement. It's not true that this person's statement is correct, but he's saying that's innocent Misrepresentation. As can be seen from the above events, the waiter was able to assume that the dish was beef and that it was meat, thus showing that the waiter was honest about his statement being correct, so it belonged to Innocent Misrepresentation.

Based on the above, I think the waiter of the restaurant is innocent misrepresentation. Innocent misrepresentation means that someone believes that the statement is true for reasonable reasons, whether at the time of statement or contract. Although the statement made by this person is not correct, he honestly believes that his statement is correct. This is innocent misrepresentation. It can be seen from the above events that the waiter thought that the dish was beef on a reasonable basis, but in fact it was pork. Thus it was evident that the waiter was honest that he was right in the statement, so it belonged to Innocent Misrepresentation.<br>