以上事实可充分证明： 被申请人刘代婵及与其具密切关联关系人员郑英华“以

The above facts can fully prove that: <br><br>the respondent Liu Daichan and her close associate Zheng Yinghua "under the guise of the disputed trademark, actually sold the goods counterfeiting the applicant's trademark", and the applicant's trademark used on the goods and product packaging included: People's word mark "Pandora" (as shown in the above table, the goods sold by Zheng Yinghua clearly use the description of "Pandora Dreamcatcher") "PANDORA", word and graphic trademarks " " and " ", graphic trademark " " and text Trademark "ALE". The respondent clearly knew the applicant's trademark, imitated and copied the applicant's trademark "Pandora", and registered the disputed trademark by adding words before and after the applicant's trademark "Pandora". The respondent has obvious subjective malice to cling to the high popularity of the applicant's trademark and seek improper benefits.

The above facts fully prove that:<br>The respondent Liu Daichan and Zheng Yinghua, who are closely related to them, "used the disputed trademark as a pretext to actually sell goods that counterfeit the applicant's trademark." The applicant's trademark used on the goods and packaging includes: the applicant's written trademark "Pandora" (as shown in the above table, Zheng Yinghua's goods sold clearly use descriptions such as "Pandora Dream Catching Network"), "PANDORA", text and graphic trademarks "and" " The graphic trademark "" and the textual trademark "ALE". The respondent, knowing the applicant's trademark, imitated and copied the applicant's trademark "Pandora", and registered the disputed trademark by adding words before and after the applicant's trademark "Pandora". The respondent has obvious subjective malice in attaching to the high reputation of the applicant's trademark and seeking improper benefits.

The above facts can fully prove that:<br> <br> Liu Daichan, the respondent, and Zheng Yinghua, a person closely related to him, "actually sell goods with the applicant's trademark as a cover", and the applicant's trademarks used in the goods and commodity packaging include: PANDORA, the word mark of the applicant (as shown in the above table, the goods sold by Zheng Yinghua clearly use the description of Pandora's dream catcher), Pandora, and text and graphic trademarks. Knowing the applicant's trademark, the respondent imitated and copied the applicant's trademark Pandora, and registered the disputed trademark by adding words before and after the applicant's trademark Pandora. The respondent has obvious subjective malice of clinging to the applicant's trademark and seeking improper benefits.