我们通过微信进行交流,在假定设计标准和质量要求相同的前提下,对比两种施工方式下施工图预算造价如下:3#楼装配式设计与现浇设计造价对比 从上表的英语翻译

我们通过微信进行交流,在假定设计标准和质量要求相同的前提下,对比两种施

我们通过微信进行交流,在假定设计标准和质量要求相同的前提下,对比两种施工方式下施工图预算造价如下:3#楼装配式设计与现浇设计造价对比 从上表可以看出,同一住宅建筑,装配式设计平米建安费用比现浇设计平米建安费用低出783.94元,其中,土建工程高出811.71元。不难发现,两种施工方式造价差异主要集中在土建工程上。
0/5000
源语言: -
目标语言: -
结果 (英语) 1: [复制]
复制成功!
We communicate through WeChat, and on the premise of assuming that the design standards and quality requirements are the same, compare the construction cost of the construction drawings under the two construction methods as follows: <br><br>3# building assembly design and cast-in-situ design cost comparison <br> <br><br>from the above table can be seen, the same For residential buildings, the cost of prefabricated square meter construction and installation is 783.94 yuan lower than the cost of cast-in-place design square meter construction and installation, of which, civil engineering is 811.71 yuan higher. It is not difficult to find that the difference in cost between the two construction methods is mainly concentrated on civil engineering.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 2:[复制]
复制成功!
We communicate through WeChat, assuming that the design standards and quality requirements are the same, compare the budget cost of the construction drawings under the two construction methods as follows:<br><br>Comparison of the design of assembly type and the cost of watering design<br> <br>As can be seen from the above table, the same residential building, assembly-type design square meters of construction and security costs than the current watering design square meters construction costs lower than 783.94 yuan, of which, civil works higher than 811.71 yuan. It is not difficult to find that the cost difference between the two construction methods is mainly concentrated in civil engineering.
正在翻译中..
结果 (英语) 3:[复制]
复制成功!
We communicate through wechat, and under the premise of the same design standards and quality requirements, the budget cost of construction drawings under the two construction methods is compared as follows:<br>Cost comparison between prefabricated design and cast-in-place design of 3-storey building<br>It can be seen from the above table that the construction and installation cost per square meter of prefabricated design is 783.94 yuan lower than that of cast-in-place design square meter for the same residential building, of which, the civil engineering cost is 811.71 yuan higher. It is not difficult to find that the cost difference between the two construction methods is mainly concentrated in the civil engineering.<br>
正在翻译中..
 
其它语言
本翻译工具支持: 世界语, 丹麦语, 乌克兰语, 乌兹别克语, 乌尔都语, 亚美尼亚语, 伊博语, 俄语, 保加利亚语, 信德语, 修纳语, 僧伽罗语, 克林贡语, 克罗地亚语, 冰岛语, 加利西亚语, 加泰罗尼亚语, 匈牙利语, 南非祖鲁语, 南非科萨语, 卡纳达语, 卢旺达语, 卢森堡语, 印地语, 印尼巽他语, 印尼爪哇语, 印尼语, 古吉拉特语, 吉尔吉斯语, 哈萨克语, 土库曼语, 土耳其语, 塔吉克语, 塞尔维亚语, 塞索托语, 夏威夷语, 奥利亚语, 威尔士语, 孟加拉语, 宿务语, 尼泊尔语, 巴斯克语, 布尔语(南非荷兰语), 希伯来语, 希腊语, 库尔德语, 弗里西语, 德语, 意大利语, 意第绪语, 拉丁语, 拉脱维亚语, 挪威语, 捷克语, 斯洛伐克语, 斯洛文尼亚语, 斯瓦希里语, 旁遮普语, 日语, 普什图语, 格鲁吉亚语, 毛利语, 法语, 波兰语, 波斯尼亚语, 波斯语, 泰卢固语, 泰米尔语, 泰语, 海地克里奥尔语, 爱尔兰语, 爱沙尼亚语, 瑞典语, 白俄罗斯语, 科西嘉语, 立陶宛语, 简体中文, 索马里语, 繁体中文, 约鲁巴语, 维吾尔语, 缅甸语, 罗马尼亚语, 老挝语, 自动识别, 芬兰语, 苏格兰盖尔语, 苗语, 英语, 荷兰语, 菲律宾语, 萨摩亚语, 葡萄牙语, 蒙古语, 西班牙语, 豪萨语, 越南语, 阿塞拜疆语, 阿姆哈拉语, 阿尔巴尼亚语, 阿拉伯语, 鞑靼语, 韩语, 马其顿语, 马尔加什语, 马拉地语, 马拉雅拉姆语, 马来语, 马耳他语, 高棉语, 齐切瓦语, 等语言的翻译.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: