正如Mani等人（2013）以印度南部Tamil Nadu种植甘蔗的农

Just as Mani et al. (2013) conducted a field experiment using sugarcane farmers in Tamil Nadu in southern India as subjects, they found that farmers’ performance on the Raven test and Stroop task before harvest was significantly lower than that after harvest. which performed. <br><br>The hypothesis that poverty causes depletion of cognitive resources is also supported by a previous study on the relationship between long-term persistent poverty and impaired working memory at the age of 17. <br><br>The trend of macroeconomic operation. <br><br>Adaptive responses will also be made by individual humans to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.

As mani et al. (2013) found in a field experiment conducted by farmers who grow sugar cane in Tamil Nadu, southern India, that farmers performed significantly less well than after harvest on the Raven test and Stroop tasks before harvest.<br><br>The hypothesis that poverty causes cognitive resource depletion is also supported by a previous study on the long-term and persistent state of poverty associated with impaired working memory at age 17.<br><br>Macroeconomic trends.<br><br>Adaptive responses can also be made by individualhumans to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.

As mani et al. (2013) conducted a field experiment with sugarcane growers in Tamil Nadu, southern India, it was found that farmers' performance on Raven test and Stroop tasks before harvest was significantly lower than that after harvest.<br>The hypothesis that poverty causes cognitive resource depletion is also supported by a previous study on the relationship between persistent poverty and impaired working memory at the age of 17.<br>The trend of macroeconomic operation.<br>Adaptive responses can also be made by individuals to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.<br>