从Mani等人（2013）以印度南部Tamil Nadu种植甘蔗的农民

From a field experiment conducted by Mani et al. (2013) using sugarcane farmers in Tamil Nadu, southern India, as subjects, it was found that the farmers’ performance on the Raven test and Stroop task before harvest was significantly lower than that after harvest. Performance. <br><br>The hypothesis that poverty causes depletion of cognitive resources is also supported by a previous study on the relationship between long-term persistent poverty and impaired working memory at the age of 17. <br><br>The trend of macroeconomic operation. <br><br>Adaptive responses will also be made by individual humans to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.

A field experiment conducted by Mani et al. (2013) for the subjects, who grew sugar cane in Tamil Nadu in southern India, found that farmers performed significantly less well on the Raven test and Stroop tasks before harvest.<br><br>The hypothesis that poverty causes cognitive resource depletion is also supported by a previous study on the long-term and persistent state of poverty associated with impaired working memory at age 17.<br><br>Macroeconomic trends.<br><br>Adaptive responses can also be made by individualhumans to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.

In a field experiment conducted by Mani et al. (2013) on sugarcane farmers in Tamil Nadu, southern India, it was found that the performance of the Raven test and Stroop tasks before harvest was significantly lower than that after harvest.<br>The hypothesis that poverty causes cognitive resource depletion is also supported by a previous study on the relationship between persistent poverty and impaired working memory at the age of 17.<br>The trend of macroeconomic operation.<br>Adaptive responses can also be made by individuals to macroeconomic changes, and the "lipstick effect" is a typical example.<br>