在这些研究中存在着如下不足：首先，这些研究大多是基于地上建筑设计方法的

The following deficiencies exist in these studies: First, most of these studies are based on the design method of above-ground buildings, and lack of consideration of the specificity of the underground space; Second, the studies are usually concentrated on some popular levels, and have not formed A comprehensive multi-level design method and evaluation system; in the end, the lack of depth and quantification of research has led to the excessive application of humanized design and sustainable development of underground space in underground space. The lack of a unified theoretical guidance in the actual construction has led to the uncommon application of people-oriented underground public space design in practice.

In these studies, there are the following shortcomings: first, most of these studies are based on above-ground architectural design methods, lack of consideration of the particularity of underground space; In the actual construction, there is a lack of a unified theoretical guidance, which leads to the people-oriented underground public space design in practice is not common application.

In these studies, there are the following deficiencies: first, most of these studies are based on the above ground architectural design methods, lack of consideration for the particularity of underground space; second, the research is usually focused on some of the more popular aspects, and does not form a comprehensive multi-level design method and evaluation system; finally, the lack of depth and quantification of research makes people The application of humanized design and sustainable development of underground space in the underground space is too much to stay in a qualitative level, and lacks a unified theoretical guidance in the actual construction, which leads to the fact that the application of people-oriented underground public space design in practice is not universal.<br>