至于翻译的标准，目的论用充分性(adequacy)而非等值(equiv

As for the standard of translation, with teleological adequacy (adequacy) rather than equivalent (equivalence) as the criteria for evaluating the translation. In the framework of the teleological theory, it refers to the adequacy of the translation to comply with the requirements of translation purposes, "in the process of translation translation selected to achieve the purpose of the sign objective-based." This is a dynamic concept of translation-related behavior. Equivalent means the target text and source text for a different cultural context but to achieve a similar communicative function. The equivalent of just one manifestation of adequacy, is to describe the translation of a static concept. From the above analysis, we learned that the principle of coherence and fidelity principle is not universally applicable, in the translation process, we should aim to principles and guided by the principles of loyalty, with the appropriate criteria for evaluating a translation. <br>With the traditional "concept of equivalence" Different, Germany teleological function is not focused on the original and asked whether a peer, but stressed that the translator during the translation to the intended function as a starting point, according to various contextual factors, to choose the best Approach. In other words, the translator of the translation strategies must be determined by the intended purpose or function of the translation, the so-called "The purpose of the law." Focus on the translation function at the same time, the theory while emphasizing translations readability in the target language environment, that "coherence rule", and Interlingual between the translation and the original continuity, that "faithful principle", but the latter two are It must be subordinated to the purpose principle.

As for the criteria for translation, the theory of purpose uses adequacy rather than equivalence as the criterion for evaluating translations. Under the framework of the theory of purpose, adequacy means that the translation should meet the requirements of the translation purpose, and "choose the symbol to achieve the purpose of translation on the basis of goal in the process of translation". This is a dynamic concept related to translation behavior. Equivalent value refers to the translation of the language and the source language text for different cultural contexts but the realization of similar communicative functions. Equidistant value is only a form of fullness and a static concept that describes the results of translation. From the above analysis, we understand that the principle of consistency and loyalty are not universally applicable, in the translation process we should be guided by the principle of purpose and loyalty, using appropriate as the standard for evaluating the translation.<br>Unlike the traditional "equidistant view", the German functional purpose theory focuses not on whether the translation is equivalent to the original text, but on the translator's intention in the translation process to take the expected function of the translation as the starting point, according to various context factors, choose the best treatment method. In other words, the translator's translation strategy must be determined by the intended purpose or function of the translation, the so-called "law of purpose". While focusing on the function of translation, the theory emphasizes the readability of the translation in the translation environment, that is, the "law of coherence" and the interlingual coherence between the translation and the original text, that is, the "principle of loyalty", but the latter both must be subordinated to the principle of purpose.

As for the criteria of translation, the skopos theory uses adequacy rather than equivalence as the criteria for evaluating translation. Under the framework of Skopos theory, sufficiency means that the target text should meet the requirements of the translation purpose, and "in the process of translation, the symbols to achieve the translation purpose should be selected on the basis of the target". This is a dynamic concept related to translation behavior. Equivalence refers to the fact that the translated text and the source text have achieved similar communicative functions in different cultural contexts. Equivalence is only a form of sufficiency and a static concept to describe translation results. From the above analysis, we can see that the principles of coherence and faithfulness are not universally applicable. In the process of translation, we should take the principles of purpose and faithfulness as the guidance and use appropriateness as the criteria for evaluating the translation.<br>Different from the traditional concept of equivalence, German functional Skopos focuses not on the equivalence between the translation and the original, but on the translator's choice of the best way to deal with it according to the expected function of the translation. In other words, the translator's translation strategy must be determined by the intended purpose or function of the translation, that is, the so-called "purpose principle". While paying attention to the function of translation, the theory also emphasizes the readability of translation in the context of the target language, that is, the rule of coherence, and the interlingual coherence between the target language and the original language, that is, the principle of faithfulness.