经过两轮专家函询后，两轮函询的专家积极性高，专家函询问卷回收率分别是

After two rounds of expert consultation letter, two letters of inquiry motivated experts, specialists letter asking Volume recovery was respectively <br>89.47% and 100% authority coefficient is 0.865 and 0.891, the experts authority coefficient rounds are higher than 0.7, indicating expert <br>higher level of authority, the extent of the authority of experts provides reliable protection for this study. In this study, two rounds of the coefficient of variation <br>between 0.10 to 0.21, the coefficient of variation of less than 0.25, indicating a high degree of coordination experts, this research program entries were discharged <br>less than 0.25, indicating that the results of consultation letter desirable. Followed by two rounds of the outcome of the expert consultation letter in coordination coefficient of 0.225 and <br>0.114, indicating that expert opinions converge. Ultimately determine nurse-led gastric cancer patients after discharge planning content including a total <br>assessment of discharge planning, discharge planning to develop, discharge planning evaluation of three parts, contains an index three, two refers to the <br>standard nine, three indicators 44 , the analysis of the right to re-entry levels, nurse-led construction of gastric cancer discharge planning. <br>Analysis conclusion:

After two rounds of expert inquiry, two rounds of inquiry of the expert enthusiasm is high, expert letter inquiry volume recovery rate is respectively<br> 89.47% and 100%, authority coefficients of 0.865 and 0.891, both rounds of expert authority coefficients above 0.7, indicating that experts<br> The degree of authority is high, and the degree of expert authority provides a reliable guarantee for this research. The coefficient of variation of the two rounds in this study<br> Between 0.10 and 0.21, the coefficient of variation is less than 0.25, indicating that the degree of expert coordination is high, and the items of the discharge plan are all in this topic.<br> Less than 0.25 indicates that the result of the inquiry is desirable. The coordination coefficients in the results of the two rounds of expert inquiries were 0.225 and<br> 0.114, indicating that expert opinion tends to be consistent. The final decision on nurse-led discharge plan for patients after gastric cancer surgery includes<br> The evaluation of discharge plan, the formulation of discharge plan, and the evaluation of discharge plan are three major parts, including three first-level indicators, and the second-level refers to<br> Standard 9, three-level indicator 44 items, after analyzing the weight of entries at all levels, to build a nurse-led gastric cancer postoperative discharge plan. <br> The findings:

After two rounds of expert correspondence, the enthusiasm of the experts in the two rounds is high, and the recovery rate of the questionnaire is respectively<br>89.47% and 100%, the authority coefficient is 0.865 and 0.891, and the authority coefficient of experts in both rounds is higher than 0.7, indicating that experts<br>The authority level of experts is high, which provides a reliable guarantee for this study. Coefficient of variation of two rounds in this study<br>From 0.10 to 0.21, the coefficient of variation is lower than 0.25, which indicates that the experts have a high degree of coordination. The discharge plan items of this study are all<br>Less than 0.25, indicating that the inquiry result is acceptable. The coordination coefficients of the two rounds of expert correspondence are 0.225 and 0.225 respectively<br>0.114, indicating the consensus of experts. Finally, the content of discharge plan for patients with gastric cancer after operation led by nurses was determined<br>Discharge plan evaluation, discharge plan formulation and discharge plan evaluation are three major parts, including three primary indicators, and two secondary indicators<br>Based on the analysis of the weight of the items at all levels, a nurse led discharge plan was constructed.<br>Conclusion: