在对话中我们可以看见他反问了对反很多次，由此我们可以看出他内心的纠结，

In the dialogue, we can see that he asked the opponent many times. From this we can see his inner entanglement. At the end of the dialogue, he still decided to be honest with the patient. In his opinion, the patient has the right to know that he is sick. In the end he chose to tell the patient directly that he had cancer.

In the dialogue we can see him asking the opposite many times, and thus we can see his inner tangle, at the end of the conversation, he decided to be honest with the patient, in his view, the patient has the right to know his illness, and finally he chose to tell the patient directly that he has cancer.

In the dialogue, we can see that he asked the opposite questions many times, from which we can see his inner entanglement. At the end of the dialogue, he decided to be frank with the patient. In his opinion, the patient has the right to know his condition, and finally he chose to directly tell the patient that he has cancer.<br>