Daisy Company是可以避免因Kevin的未授權行為而引起的責

Daisy Company can avoid the liability caused by Kevin's unauthorized behavior. This is because it is stated in Vicarious Liability that the employer must prove that these actions are not related to work or have been explicitly prohibited by the employer. According to the above situation, it can be seen that Kevin has completed the work of the day, and the manager clearly forbids the use of company vehicles for private purposes, but Kevin uses the company vehicles for private purposes, causing losses to the shopping mall, so Daisy Company can avoid Kevin ’s Liability arising from authorized actions.

Daisy Company是可以避免因Kevin的未授權行為而引起的責任。是因为在 Vicarious Liability 中说明雇主必须证明这些行为与工作无关或者是已被雇主明确禁止。根据上述情况，可以看出Kevin已经完成当天工作，并且经理明确禁止利用公司车辆做私人用途，但是Kevin就利用公司车辆做私人用途，造成购物中心的损失，所以Daisy Company是可以避免因Kevin的未授權行為而引起的責任。

Daisy company is able to avoid the liability caused by Kevin's unauthorized behavior. The reason is that in vicarious liability, the employer must prove that these behaviors have nothing to do with the work or have been explicitly prohibited by the employer. According to the above situation, it can be seen that Kevin has completed the work of the day, and the manager explicitly prohibits using the company's vehicles for private purposes, but Kevin uses the company's vehicles for private purposes, resulting in the loss of the shopping center, so the daisy company can avoid the responsibility caused by Kevin's unauthorized behavior.<br>