这又是一个因为忽视保险“盲区”而使我方出口公司遭受损失的例子。可见在以

This is another example of the loss of our export company due to neglect of insurance "blind spots". It can be seen that under the contract concluded in CIF price terms, if the seller has luck or other reasons and insured the goods after shipment, then there is a time difference from the time of shipment to the preservation of the investment. Within this time difference, the goods may suffer Loss (such as the loss of the goods after leaving the seller ’s warehouse at the port of shipment and before shipment, or the goods are exposed to rain during the shipment, or the hook is tripped and the goods fall into the sea, etc.) is behind. At this time, if the seller, the insured (also the insured), wants to obtain compensation from the insurance company, according to the relevant regulations of the international insurance industry, the seller must have proof that the loss of the subject matter of the insurance is indeed unaware when the insurance is applied, otherwise the insurance company It shall not be liable for compensation for the loss suffered by the goods before insurance. Since the seller knows the shipping process very well in actual work, it is difficult for the seller to prove that he did not know about the loss when insuring.

This is another example of the loss of our export company by ignoring the "blind spot" of insurance. Visible in the CIF price term of the contract, if the seller has a lucky psychological or other reasons after the shipment of the goods insurance, then, from the shipment to the insurance there is a time difference, in this time difference the goods may suffer losses (such as the goods after leaving the port of departure of the seller's warehouse and before the loading of the loss, or the goods in the process of loading rain, or hook sclending and cargo landing loss, etc.), that is, after the loss. At this time, the seller is the insured (also the insured) to obtain compensation from the insurance company, according to the relevant provisions of the international insurance industry, the seller in the insurance must have the loss of the subject matter of the insurance is indeed uninformed proof, otherwise the insurance company will not be liable for the loss of the goods suffered before the insurance. Since the seller is well aware of the loading process in practice, it is difficult for the seller to prove that it was indeed unaware of the loss at the time of the insurance.

This is another example of the loss suffered by our export company due to the neglect of the "blind area" of insurance. It can be seen that under a contract concluded on CIF terms, if the seller has a fluke mentality or other reasons to insure the goods after shipment, then there is a time difference between shipment and insurance, within which the goods are likely to suffer losses (for example, the goods suffer losses after leaving the seller's warehouse at the port of shipment and before shipment, or the goods suffer rain during shipment Drenching, or loss of goods falling into the sea due to hook tripping), i.e. the loss is in the front and the insurance is in the back. At this time, if the seller, that is, the applicant (also the insured), wants to get compensation from the insurance company, according to the relevant provisions of the international insurance industry, the seller must have a certificate that he does not know the loss of the subject matter insured, otherwise the insurance company will not be liable for the loss of the goods before the insurance. As the seller is very familiar with the loading process in practical work, it is difficult for the seller to prove that he did not know the loss when he insured.<br>