文章的第47段说霍默就此消失了，而“我们”也几乎没有再见到艾米丽小姐了

Paragraph 47 of the article says Homer disappear, while "we" hardly to see Miss Emily, and article 50 paragraph 47 of the narrator should contemporaries and Emily, 49 segment appears "Colonel Sartre Rees and his contemporaries regarded her daughter and granddaughter to learn there", and paragraph 50 "later, the town became the backbone of a new generation and soul" appears, this two-person appears, were indicative of the narrator is not any one of them, therefore, section 47 to section 50 should be the narrator and Emily contemporaries.

Paragraph 47 of the article says that Homer has disappeared, and that "we" have hardly seen Miss Emily again, and that the narrator should be the same person who is with Emily, that "Colonel Satris and his contemporaries send their daughters and granddaughters to study" and that appears in paragraph 50. Later, a new generation became the backbone and soul of the town," the emergence of these two people suggests that the narrator is not any of them, so the 47-50 narrator should be the same generation as Emily.

In paragraph 47 of the article, Homer disappeared, and "we" hardly saw Miss Emily again. In paragraphs 47 to 50 of the article, the narrator should be the same age as Emily. In paragraph 49, "Colonel Sartres and his contemporaries sent their daughters and granddaughters to her for study" and in paragraph 50, "later, the new generation became the backbone of the town The emergence of "soul" indicates that the narrator is not any of them. Therefore, the narrator in paragraphs 47 to 50 should be a contemporary of Emily.<br>