In this study, retrospective methods were used, and GISTs risk classification and ki67 index prediction models were constructed based on multi-center CT (computed tomography) image data and utilized multi-classifier imaging histology techniques, with the potential to help clinicians stratify patients and treat them with precision.<br>The study is divided into the following two parts.<br><br>The first part. <br>Based on CT imaging histology, the risk rating of gastrointestinal mesothelioma was predicted.<br><br>Objective:<br>The risk of tumor recurrence can be determined by the classification of pathological risk of gastrointestinal mesothelioma (GISTs).<br>CT (computed tomography) is currently the main means of GISTs diagnosis and treatment.<br><br>This study was designed to attempt to develop and validate a preoperative prediction model for the classification of the risk of gastrointestinal mesothelioma (GISTs) based on CT imaging histology techniques.<br><br>Method:<br>The retrospective analysis was conducted on 324 surgically pathologically confirmed GIST patients from 3 hospitals (180 training sets and 144 external test sets).<br><br>MatLAB-based IBEX software packages are used to map the area of interest (regions of interest, ROI) layer by layer along the inner edge of tumor contours on arterial and intravenous CT images, extracting the image histological characteristics of GISTs and gradually reducing the dimensional characteristics.<br><br>The training set uses three classification algorithms (Logistics regression, SVM and random forest) to establish a GIST risk grading prediction model, evaluate and compare model effectiveness using the confusion matrix-related parameters and the subject's working characteristic curve (receiver operating characteristics curve, ROC), and verify it with external data.<br><br>Results:<br>In GISTs risk ii classification prediction, Logistic regression AAUC was 0.84 and 0.85 in training set and external verification set, 0.81 and 0.80 in training set and external verification set, and random forest AAUC in training set and external verification set, respectively.<br><br>The random forest model is the best performance in both the training set and the test set, and the generalization ability is good.<br><br>In the GISTs risk three categories, the logistic regression training concentration macro average AAUC is 0.85, the micro-average AUC is 0.85, the external verification macro average AUC is 0.75, and the micro-average AAUC is 0.77.<br><br>SVM has an average AUC of 0.50 and a micro-average AUC of 0.61 in training concentration.<br>The average AUC of the external verification centralized macro is 0.50 and the micro-average AUC is 0.60.<br><br>Random Forest has an average AUC of 0.79, a micro-average of 0.81, an AUC of 0.83 and a micro-average of 0.83 in external verification. SVM performed worst and random forests were the most stable.<br><br>Conclusion:<br>Different machine learning models based on CT radiology can effectively predict GIST risk classification, in which the radiological model based on random forest algorithm has the highest prediction effectiveness, generalization ability, and it is proved in external test data, has the potential to help clinicians predict GIST risk level before surgery, can help clinicians to stratify patients, precision treatment.<br> <br>Keywords: gastrointestinal mesothelioma; risk classification; radiology;
正在翻译中..